Demanding Truth: Thousands March for Tommy Robinson in Britain

A reckoning stirs in the streets of Britain. Across the land, from the industrial heartlands to the capital’s cobbled squares, thousands march—not with violence, not with destruction, but with a righteous demand that those in power would rather ignore. They march for the freedom of a man whom the establishment has sought to silence, a man whose only crime was to tell the truth that Britain’s rulers found too uncomfortable to bear.

The imprisonment of Tommy Robinson is not merely an injustice; it is a damning indictment of a government and a judiciary more preoccupied with preserving their own fragile reputations than with upholding the fundamental liberties of the people. They locked him away, believing they erase him from public consciousness, believing they stamp out dissent by branding it as extremism. And yet, in doing so, they have only confirmed what so many feared: that the guardians of justice have become its greatest perverters.

For years, Robinson was the lone voice in the wilderness, daring to report on the organised and systematic abuse that others refused to acknowledge. He was ridiculed, smeared, and dismissed as an agitator. But now, his greatest vindication comes not from his own words, but from the slow and reluctant admissions of the very institutions that once condemned him. The facts he laid bare—the horrific reality of rape gangs that preyed upon Britain’s most vulnerable—were not the fevered imaginings of a radical, but the cold, brutal truth that the political class had spent decades suppressing.

And so the people march, their voices rising against the silence that has been imposed upon them. The government, already fragile, reels from the sight of tens of thousands demanding justice. The judiciary, humiliated by the weight of the evidence that has proven Robinson right, clings desperately to legal technicalities to justify his continued imprisonment. They know what is at stake. To release him would be an admission of their own complicity, an acknowledgment that their grand narrative of moral superiority was built on deception and cowardice.

But the people will not be cowed. Their demand is simple: justice. Not just for one man, but for a nation betrayed. This is not the end of their struggle. It is only the beginning.

Justice Betrayed: The Plight of Victims in British Courts

Oh, justice! Where is your guiding hand?
In Britain’s courts, a fractured land,
Three arms of law now feeble, blind,
Betray the broken, torment the kind.

The Prime Minister speaks, but his words are a stain,
Shielding the guilty, dismissing the pain.
A nation’s children, their innocence torn,
While Westminster slumbers, complicit, forlorn.

The judges, the lawmen, the councillors too,
Turn from the cries of the girls they once knew.
For fear of offence, for fear of reprieve,
They bury the truth, and let evil believe.

Call it grooming? No, call it by name!
Rape, degradation, a nation’s shame.
Yet those in power cast victims aside,
In service of optics, they let justice slide.

The police, meant to guard, protect,
Became complicit, their duty wrecked.
One whispered, “It’ll teach her a lesson, you’ll see,”
A protector turned predator in tyranny.

In Parliament’s halls, where answers should rise,
Silence and obfuscation fill the skies.
Multicultural dreams built on deceit,
Left broken lives strewn at their feet.

Where is inquiry? Where is reform?
The storm grows louder; the grief grows warm.
But ministers falter, their vision unclear,
Protecting their ranks while neglecting the sear.

Sir Keir kneels for the causes afar,
But not for the girls left battered and scarred.
He speaks of division, of far-right bands,
While ignoring the torment at his homeland’s hands.

Justice, oh justice, where have you gone?
The song of the broken, their harrowing song,
Echoes through courtrooms, through councils, through time,
Yet no one answers for such a crime.

Deport the dual citizens, bring the truth to light,
End the silence that cloaks the night.
Let inquiry reign, let victims be heard,
Restore the meaning to justice’s word.

For the mothers who weep, for the daughters who fall,
For the soul of a nation—hear their call.
Three arms of justice, mend your decay,
Or step aside for a brighter day.

Building A New Constitution

Introduction

Creating a constitution is a significant undertaking that requires careful planning, consultation, and drafting. The process ensures that the constitution not only establishes fundamental principles and rules governing a state but also reflects the values and rights of its people. Given the gravity of this process, it must be transparent, participatory, and robust enough to stand the test of time. Below is a detailed, multi-year schedule to develop a constitution, with provisions to involve the public, manage relations with the government, and include a judiciary framework.

Phase 1: Pre-consultation and Framework Development (Year 1)

1.1 Establishment of a Constitutional Commission (Months 1-3)

  • Objective: Create an independent and non-partisan body responsible for managing the constitutional process.
  • Tasks:
  • Appoint constitutional law experts, historians, civil society representatives, and political scientists.
  • Ensure that commission members represent various demographic groups, including minority populations.
  • Secure financial and logistical support, ensuring full transparency of funding.
  • Develop clear terms of reference for the commission’s work, including its obligations to consult with the public.

1.2 Baseline Study and Initial Public Engagement (Months 4-6)

  • Objective: Conduct research and assess public expectations from the constitution.
  • Tasks:
  • Perform a study on existing constitutional frameworks globally and domestically.
  • Conduct surveys and public opinion polls to understand the population’s key concerns (e.g., rights, freedoms, balance of powers).
  • Develop an online platform for ongoing public feedback.
  • Arrange town halls and community meetings to educate the public on constitutional issues and the role of a constitution.

1.3 Establishment of Key Principles (Months 7-12)

  • Objective: Create a preliminary list of guiding principles for the constitution.
  • Tasks:
  • The Constitutional Commission works with key legal experts and government officials to draft core principles (e.g., rule of law, separation of powers, human rights, and democracy).
  • Create a public consultation document outlining the key areas the constitution will address, such as:
    • Government Structure (Executive, Legislative, and Judicial branches).
    • Fundamental Rights (Civil liberties, privacy, and economic/social rights).
    • Judicial Independence (Ensuring courts remain independent from governmental influence).
    • National Defence and Foreign Policy.
    • State Accountability Mechanisms.
  • Public Feedback: Publish the key principles and seek feedback through public forums, debates, and media campaigns.

Phase 2: Drafting the Constitution (Year 2)

2.1 Drafting of the First Constitutional Proposal (Months 1-6)

  • Objective: Begin the drafting process based on feedback from Phase 1.
  • Tasks:
  • Divide the constitution into chapters: rights and freedoms, the structure of government, the judiciary, national security, etc.
  • Draft sections on:
    • Legislative Branch: Define the structure, powers, election processes, and terms for parliamentarians.
    • Executive Branch: Limit the powers of the prime minister while ensuring executive accountability.
    • Judiciary: Establish a supreme court or constitutional court, with clear provisions ensuring judicial independence.
    • Citizens’ Rights and Responsibilities: Ensure a robust Bill of Rights that cannot be overridden by government decree.
    • Amendment Process: Define a clear and transparent process for future amendments, requiring both legislative approval and public consent.
  • Conduct stakeholder workshops with civil society organisations, legal bodies, and political representatives.

2.2 National Consultation and Debate (Months 7-12)

  • Objective: Engage the public and stakeholders in a nationwide dialogue.
  • Tasks:
  • Organise televised debates and public meetings to discuss the draft constitution.
  • Provide an accessible version of the draft for general public distribution, including easy-to-understand explanations for each section.
  • Encourage public input through town halls, online platforms, and citizen panels.
  • Incorporate specific focus groups (youth, women, minorities) to ensure wide representation.
  • Referendum Planning: Begin the process of planning a referendum, focusing on:
  • Deciding which controversial or core issues (e.g., religion and state, executive powers) will be put to referendum.
  • Developing clear, unbiased referendum questions to present to the public.

Phase 3: Revision and Referendum Preparation (Year 3)

3.1 Final Drafting of the Constitution (Months 1-6)

  • Objective: Refine and finalise the constitution based on public feedback.
  • Tasks:
  • The Constitutional Commission revises the draft based on the results of the public consultation.
  • Ensure the final draft addresses all constitutional matters, particularly on controversial points raised during consultations (e.g., the balance of powers, individual vs. collective rights).
  • Work closely with the judiciary to ensure legal frameworks are sound and enforceable.
  • Publish the final draft in all national languages, ensuring accessibility to all citizens.

3.2 Final Public Review and Debate (Months 7-9)

  • Objective: Provide one final opportunity for the public to review and debate the proposed constitution.
  • Tasks:
  • Organise a final round of public debates, town hall meetings, and media campaigns to discuss the final draft.
  • Provide the public with detailed comparisons between the current system (if any) and the proposed constitution.

3.3 National Referendum (Months 10-12)

  • Objective: Hold a national referendum to ratify the constitution.
  • Tasks:
  • Hold a referendum on the entire constitution, with the option for the public to vote on key controversial issues separately.
  • Ensure that electoral oversight is independent and credible.
  • Launch extensive voter education campaigns, making sure people understand the referendum’s impact.
  • Results: The constitution is ratified if it receives majority support, and the controversial sections may be separately endorsed or rejected depending on the referendum structure.

Phase 4: Post-referendum Implementation and Constitutional Transition (Year 4)

4.1 Legislative and Judicial Preparation (Months 1-6)

  • Objective: Begin the process of enacting the new constitution.
  • Tasks:
  • Draft transitional laws necessary to align existing legal frameworks with the new constitution.
  • Restructure government institutions, ensuring they comply with the new constitutional rules.
  • Establish mechanisms for judicial review and constitutional interpretation, with training programmes for judges to adapt to new roles (e.g., constitutional court operations).

4.2 Ongoing Monitoring and Amendments (Months 7-12)

  • Objective: Monitor the constitution’s application and ensure its enforcement.
  • Tasks:
  • Set up a review committee within the Constitutional Commission to evaluate the implementation.
  • Ensure civil society has access to constitutional courts and other bodies to challenge unconstitutional government actions.
  • Prepare for a possible early review of the constitution’s functioning after five years to address unforeseen issues or inconsistencies.

Public Involvement Throughout the Process

Throughout each phase, public engagement is key. The population should feel a sense of ownership over the constitution. This is achieved through:

  • Regular town hall meetings, televised debates, and social media engagement.
  • Citizen panels or assemblies where ordinary people can directly contribute to decision-making.
  • Structured educational campaigns on constitutional matters, ensuring that the public is well-informed about the long-term implications of their choices.

Balancing Government, Judiciary, and Public Interests

  • Government: Guarantee that the government has a defined role in drafting and implementing the constitution but cannot dictate its contents unilaterally.
  • Judiciary: Guarantee the judiciary’s independence in interpreting and enforcing the constitution, establishing a clear separation of powers to prevent governmental overreach.
  • The People: Public referendums on key issues and continuous consultation offer democratic legitimacy and guarantee that contentious or controversial aspects of the constitution are decided by the people.